| | 24 | Trade and other receivables | | |
| | | Current | | |
| | | Financial assets: | | |
251 | 337 | | Trade receivables (gold) | 44 | 33 |
259 | 227 | | Other trade receivables (a) | 30 | 34 |
(112) | (96) | | Provision for impairment | (13) | (15) |
398 | 468 | | Trade receivables net | 61 | 52 |
112 | 40 | | Loans to associates and joint ventures (b) | 5 | 15 |
85 | 89 | | Interest and other receivables (c) | 12 | 11 |
20 | 15 | | Employee receivables | 2 | 2 |
3 | 54 | | Insurance claims receivable (d) | 7 | |
| | | Non-financial assets: | | |
74 | 65 | | Prepayments | 9 | 10 |
193 | 201 | | Value added tax | 26 | 25 |
885 | 932 | | Total current trade and other receivables | 122 | 115 |
| | | Non-current | | |
| | | Financial assets: | | |
182 | 179 | | Loans to associates (e) | 23 | 24 |
18 | 12 | | Other loans receivable | 2 | 2 |
(125) | (116) | | Provision for impairment (f) | (15) | (16) |
75 | 75 | | Total non-current trade and other receivables | 10 | 10 |
| | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | Included in other trade receivables is an amount of R6 million (US$0.7 million) (2009: R70 million (US$9.1 million)) owed by Rand Uranium. | | |
| | |
| | | |
| | |
(b) | An amount of R40 million (US$5 million) (2009: R37 million (US$4.8 million)) is due from Rand Uranium for services and goods supplied in terms of the service level agreements entered into between the group and Rand Uranium. Also included in 2009 is an amount of R75 million (US$9.7 million) receivable by Harmonys Australian operations, from Newcrest for their portion of the loan to the MMJV companies. | | |
| | |
| | | |
| | |
(c) | Included in interest and other receivables is an amount of R17 million (US$2.2 million) owing by Pamodzi FS in terms of the asset purchase agreements, for rehabilitation trust funds to be released to the group. | | |
| | |
| | | |
| | |
(d) | The insurance claim receivable of R54 million (US$7.1 million) relates to damage caused by an underground fire at the Bambanani operation. The claim was settled subsequent to the 2010 financial year end. | | |
| | |
| | | |
| | |
(e) | Included in the balance for 2010 is a loan of R63 million (US$8.3 million) (2009: R66 million (US$8.5 million)) to Rand Uranium. The loan bears interest at a three-month JIBAR plus 250 basis points and is repayable on 21 November 2015. The loan has been subordinated. Also included in this balance is a loan of R116 million (US$15.2 million), (2009: R116 million (US$15.0 million)) owed by Pamodzi. The loan bore interest at prime rate until March 2009 when Pamodzi was placed into liquidation. Harmony is a concurrent creditor in the Pamodzi Orkney liquidation. | | |
| | |
| | | |
| | |
(f) | Included in this balance is the amount of R116 million (US$15.2 million), (2009: R116 million (US$15.0 million)) relating to the loan owed by Pamodzi. In 2009, an amount of R9 million (US$1.1 million) relating to the loan owed by Ubuntu included in other loans receivable, was also provided for and subsequently written off during the 2010 financial year. Interest of R13 million (US$1.5 million) was charged on these loans in the 2009 financial year. No interest was charged in 2010. | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | The movement in the provision for impairment of trade receivables during the year was as follows: | | |
| | | | | |
132 | 112 | | Balance at beginning of year | 15 | 17 |
36 | 13 | | Provision for impairment of receivables | 2 | 4 |
(53) | (29) | | Unused amounts reversed | (4) | (6) |
(3) | | | Receivables written off during the year | | |
112 | 96 | | Balance at end of year | 13 | 15 |
| | | The movement in the provision for impairment of loans receivables during the year was as follows: | | |
15 | 125 | | Balance at beginning of year | 16 | 2 |
117 | | | Provision for impairments of loans | | 13 |
(7) | (9) | | Loans written off during the year | (1) | (1) |
| | | Translation | | 2 |
125 | 116 | | Balance at end of year | 15 | 16 |
| | | The ageing of trade receivables at the reporting date was: | | |
Impairment | Gross | | | Gross | Impairment |
| | | 30 June 2010 | | |
| 418 | | Fully performing | 55 | |
| 21 | | Past due by 1 to 30 days | 3 | |
| 17 | | Past due by 31 to 60 days | 2 | |
| 7 | | Past due by 61 to 90 days | 1 | |
27 | 27 | | Past due by more than 90 days | 4 | 4 |
69 | 74 | | Past due by more than 361 days | 9 | 9 |
96 | 564 | | | | 74 | 13 |
Impairment | Gross | | | | Gross | Impairment |
| | | 30 June 2009 | | |
| 268 | | Fully performing | 35 | |
| 106 | | Past due by 1 to 30 days | 14 | |
| 8 | | Past due by 31 to 60 days | 1 | |
| 6 | | Past due by 61 to 90 days | 1 | |
39 | 49 | | Past due by more than 90 days | 7 | 6 |
73 | 73 | | Past due by more than 361 days | 9 | 9 |
112 | 510 | | | | 67 | 15 |
| | | The ageing of loans receivable at the reporting date was: | | |
Impairment | Gross | | | | Gross | Impairment |
| | | 30 June 2010 | | |
| 75 | | Fully performing | 10 | |
| | | Past due by 1 to 30 days | | |
| | | Past due by 31 to 60 days | | |
| | | Past due by 61 to 90 days | | |
| | | Past due by more than 90 days | | |
116 | 116 | | Past due by more than 361 days | 15 | 15 |
116 | 191 | | | | 25 | 15 |
Impairment | Gross | | | | Gross | Impairment |
| | | 30 June 2009 | | |
| 75 | | Fully performing | 10 | |
| | | Past due by 1 to 30 days | | |
| | | Past due by 31 to 60 days | | |
| | | Past due by 61 to 90 days | | |
14 | 14 | | Past due by more than 90 days | 2 | 2 |
111 | 111 | | Past due by more than 361 days | 14 | 14 |
125 | 200 | | | | 26 | 16 |
| | | | | |
| | | Based on past experience, the group believes that no impairment allowance is necessary in respect of fully performing receivables as the amount relates to customers that have a good track record with the group. Similarly, the other loans and receivables noted above, other than those provided for, are fully performing and considered to be a low credit risk. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | During the 2008 financial year, the balance of R50 million (US$6 million) due from Ogoerion Construction CC for the purchase of the Deelkraal surface assets was impaired. In the 2009 financial year, the deal was renegotiated and the Deelkraal plant was excluded from the transaction. The purchase price was revised and as a result, the balance due and the related provision for impairment of trade receivables was reversed. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | During the year 2010 and 2009 financial years there was no renegotiation of the terms of any receivable, other than as discussed above. | | |
| | | | | |
| | | As at 30 June 2010 and 30 June 2009 financial years, there was no collateral pledged or held for any of the receivables. | | |