Corporate governance
KING III COMPLIANCE REPORT: 2014
In South Africa, in terms of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listings Requirements and King III, companies are required to disclose compliance with the latter in the current reporting year. The table below details Harmony’s compliance status as at 23 October 2014. We include supplementary information for a complete view of our company’s governance standards.
Principle | Apply? | Explain |
---|---|---|
Principle 1.1 | ||
The board should provide effective leadership based on an ethical foundation | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.3 |
Principle 1.2 | ||
The board should ensure the company is and is seen to be a responsible corporate citizen | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.4 |
Principle 1.3 | ||
The board should ensure the company’s ethics are managed effectively | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.5 |
Principle 2.1 | ||
The board should act as the focal point for and custodian of corporate governance | ✔ | The board advocates effective, responsible leadership and aims to lead by example. Governance structures and processes are regularly reviewed and adapted to accommodate internal developments and reflect national and international best practice while considering the best interests of the company. |
Principle 2.2 | ||
The board should appreciate that strategy, risk, performance and sustainability are inseparable | ✔ | As reflected in its terms of reference, and evident from the content of the integrated annual report, the board appreciates that strategy, risk, performance and sustainability are inseparable. The board annually considers and reviews the company’s strategy relative to its risks, performance and sustainability at a strategy session arranged specifically for this purpose. |
Principle 2.3 | ||
The board should provide effective leadership based on an ethical foundation | ✔ | The board of directors is responsible for establishing management structures and processes based on ethical values and good corporate governance principles, ensuring Harmony’s business is sustainable in terms of our financial, social and environmental performance. The board is governed by its terms of reference, downloadable from the Harmony website. The board and its committees have work plans to ensure responsibilities are appropriately addressed throughout the year. |
Principle 2.4 | ||
The board should ensure the company is and is seen to be a responsible corporate citizen | ✔ | Responsible citizenship is a core principle underpinning Harmony’s values and a key component of the board’s terms of reference. Through its social and ethics committee, the board ensures the company remains a committed, socially responsible corporate citizen. |
Principle 2.5 | ||
The board should ensure the company’s ethics are managed effectively | ✔ | Harmony’s code of ethics, downloable from our website, was adopted to respond to the challenge of ethical conduct in the business environment. The code is reviewed every Securities and Exchange Commissionond year by the board and its application is monitored by management. All employees (including contract employees), directors or officers and service providers/suppliers are expected to abide by the code. The company’s ethics programme is subject to independent assurance by means of inclusion in the internal audit coverage plan. As reported in 2013, management is revising the roles and responsibilities for various facets of ethics management (eg board committee responsibilities, fraud risk management). This will include a review and potential redesign of the ethics management programme to address integration and further improve levels of proactive ethical risk management. |
Principle 2.6 | ||
The board should ensure the company has an effective and independent audit committee | ✔ | Shareholders annually elect the members of the audit and risk committee, all of whom are independent non-executive directors. The board has approved the mandate for this committee, which includes monitoring risk management and therefore, in Harmony, the committee is known as the audit and risk committee. In FY14, the committee again complied with its legal, regulatory and other responsibilities assigned by the board in terms of its terms of reference. These are detailed in the report of the audit and risk committee. |
Principle 2.7 | ||
The board should be responsible for the governance of risk | ✔ | The board is ultimately responsible for the governance of risk in line with the Act, King III and the board’s terms of reference. The board is assisted by the audit and risk committee, ensuring that significant risks facing Harmony are adequately addressed. For more information, refer to the report of the audit and risk committee. |
Principle 2.8 | ||
The board should be responsible for information technology governance | ✔ | The audit and risk committee of the board oversees and monitors information technology governance and views this as an important aspect of risk management. Refer to the section on information technology governance in the corporate governance report. |
Principle 2.9 | ||
The board should ensure the company complies with applicable laws and considers adherence to non-binding rules, codes and standards | ✔ | One of the duties of the board is to ensure that Harmony complies with all applicable laws, in both South Africa and Papua New Guinea, and that it adheres to non-binding rules, codes and standards. During FY14 we held a workshop, attended by all departmental heads and relevant people to review the regulatory framework that governs our business. A comprehensive compliance strategy will be drafted during FY15 which will then be the framework for an overriding, renewed monitoring system. The foundation of our corporate governance is compliance with the Companies Act, the requirements of both the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, our primary listing, and the New York Stock Exchange, as well as King III and the related principles of good corporate governance. Harmony also complies voluntarily with the principles of the United Nations Global Compact, International Council of Mining and Metals, the Global Reporting Initiative and the Cyanide Code. |
Principal 2.10 | ||
The board should ensure there is an effective risk-based internal audit | ✔ | The internal audit function is responsible for assisting the board and management by independently reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of Harmony’s system of internal control. Significant findings are reported to the audit and risk committee and followup audits are conducted in areas where significant internal control weaknesses are found. Harmony has an in-house internal audit function in a co-sourced arrangement with KPMG to provide assurance on the effectiveness of governance, risk management and the internal control environment. The purpose, authority and responsibility of the internal audit function are formally documented in the internal audit charter as approved by the audit and risk committee. |
Principle 2.11 | ||
The board should appreciate that stakeholders’ perceptions affect the company’s reputation | ✔ | The board considers and responds to the legitimate interests and expectations of Harmony’s stakeholders. The social and ethics committee receives quarterly reports on stakeholder engagement, which are then summarised for board meetings. Board members are also regularly appraised of stakeholder perceptions after management road shows. |
Principle 2.12 | ||
The board should ensure the integrity of the company’s integrated report | ✔ | The integrated report is reviewed by the audit and risk committee with the assistance of the social and ethics committee (on sustainability matters). The report is recommended to the board for approval. |
Principle 2.13 | ||
The board should report on the effectiveness of the company’s system of internal controls | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.10 |
Principle 2.14 | ||
The board and its directors should act in the best interests of the company | ✔ | The board debates issues rationally and with sufficient information from management to reach an objective assessment. All directors are mindful of their duty to act in the best interests of the company. The board has approved a policy for dealing in Harmony shares which applies to directors, prescribed officers and selected employees. |
Principle 2.15 | ||
The board should consider business rescue proceedings or other turnaround mechanisms as soon as the company is financially distressed as defined in the Companies Act | ✔ | Twice a year, the board assesses Harmony’s ability to continue as a going concern and monitors its financial performance quarterly to assess whether the company is financially distressed for the purposes of considering business-rescue proceedings and to ensure sound financial management. In addition, the board receives a quarterly update of the operations and the financial position of the company through the technical, investment and audit and risk committees as well as at the board meeting. |
Principle 2.16 | ||
The board should elect a chairman who is an independent non-executive director. The chief executive officer of the company should not also fulfil the role of chairman of the board. Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listings Requirement, section 3.84(c) |
✔ | On our board, the roles of the chairman and chief executive officer are distinct and separate, as governed by the board’s terms of reference and the delegation of authority framework. Our chairman, Patrice Motsepe, was appointed based on the value he adds to Harmony in this role, as a result of the vital skills he has. Mr Motsepe has served on our board since 2003 and was re-elected as chairman in August 2014. In terms of our succession plan, the chairman is currently Securities and Exchange Commissiononded by deputy chairman, Modise Motloba, who has held this position since August 2012. As determined with the guidance of King III, Mr Motsepe is not considered to be an independent chairman. As a result, Fikile De Buck was re-appointed as our lead independent non-executive director in August 2014. Her role is in line with the recommendations of King III and she assists the board in managing any actual or perceived conflicts of interests that may arise from the chairman not being independent. Mavuso Msimang was appointed deputy lead independent non-executive director on 5 May 2014. |
Principle 2.17 | ||
The board should appoint the chief executive officer and establish a framework for the delegation of authority | ✔ | The board appointed Graham Briggs as the company’s chief executive officer with effect from 1 January 2007. During 2012, his term of employment as chief executive officer was extended to 31 October 2016. The existing delegation of authority is revised and refreshed every Securities and Exchange Commissionond year to keep it updated with any changes that may affect the authority framework. |
Principle 2.18 | ||
The board should comprise a balance of power, with a majority of non-executive directors. The majority of non-executive directors should be independent Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listings Requirement, section 3.84(b) |
✔ | We have paid specific attention to the composition of our board to ensure it reflects our objectives and is therefore sustainable. Harmony has a unitary board comprising a majority of independent non-executive directors. On recommendation by the nomination committee, in terms of the King III requirement, the board evaluated and confirmed the classification of all independent non-executive directors as independent. This includes directors serving longer than nine years. |
Principle 2.19 | ||
Directors should be appointed through a formal process Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listings Requirement, section 3.84(a) |
✔ | The responsibility for board appointments lies with the nomination committee, which recommends all new board appointments and reviews succession plans for directors and management. In line with King III, the board chairman is a member of this committee, and the procedures governing appointments are formal and transparent. While the nomination committee recommends individuals as members of the board, the appointment of board members is considered by the board as a whole, in accordance with its terms of reference. These appointments are, in turn, approved by shareholders. When making new appointments to the board, Harmony considers the following factors: skills; experience; gender; and demographics. We are satisfied that we currently have an acceptable balance of members and that our non-executive and independent directors have sufficient experience and knowledge among them to carry significant weight in the board’s decision-making process. |
Principle 2.20 | ||
The induction and ongoing training and development of directors should be conducted through formal processes | ✔ | Once appointed, directors undergo the company’s board induction programme. Managed by the company Securities and Exchange Commissionretary, this programme provides new board members with comprehensive company information and governance packs. It also offers directors the opportunity to meet with various management teams and tour the business. A formal training-needs analysis is conducted annually to ensure board members are appropriately trained with ad hoc training opportunities identified during the year. Formal training on relevant topics is given at each board meeting, while the company Securities and Exchange Commissionretary provides board members with regular updates on regulatory and industry developments. Our board also takes time to visit our operations and community projects during the year. |
Principle 2.21 | ||
The board should be assisted by a competent, suitably qualified and experienced company Securities and Exchange Commissionretary Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listings Requirement, section 3.84(i)&(j) |
✔ | In terms of the relevant section of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listings Requirements, the board has, on recommendation from the nomination committee, considered the qualifications, level of experience and competence of the company Securities and Exchange Commissionretary. The board is satisfied that Riana Bisschoff is sufficiently competent, qualified and experienced to act as Harmony’s company Securities and Exchange Commissionretary. The board is further satisfied that Riana is not a director of the board or any of the company’s subsidiaries and maintained an arm’s-length relationship with the board during the year under review. The following information was taken into consideration during the review: Riana Bisschoff (LLB, LLM) is a qualified attorney, conveyancer and notary. She has been a company Securities and Exchange Commissionretary for the past ten years (seven years in a listed environment). Riana was appointed group company Securities and Exchange Commissionretary in March 2012, and is fully supported by the board and management. She plays an active role in achieving good corporate governance, supporting the chairman and the board in:
|
Principle 2.22 | ||
The evaluation of the board, its committees and individual directors should be performed every year | ✔ | The board conducts annual self-assessments of its own performance, as well as that of its board committees, individual directors and the chairman. The audit firm, KPMG, assists with this, adding accountability to the process. From this process, a full report of the findings and recommendations is drawn up, and the board implements any changes necessary during the following financial year. |
Principle 2.23 | ||
The board should delegate certain functions to well-structured committees without abdicating its own responsibilities Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listings Requirement, section 3.84(d) |
✔ | In order to focus on our priorities, particular responsibilities have been delegated to board committees in terms of the board delegation of authority and the committees’ terms of reference. These committees do not abdicate the board’s overall responsibility but rather serve to support the board in executing that responsibility. At each board meeting, the committee chairmen report on the activities of their respective committees and make recommendations on key decisions. Some duties are further delegated to the chief executive officer and financial director who, in turn, delegate some of these responsibilities to the executive committee (Exco) and management, who are closer to the operations. A clear line of communication is in place to ensure these responsibilities are well managed, underpinning our value of accountability. Each committee comprises board members with the skills and expertise that suit its portfolio, allowing committee members to apply their minds and make well-considered recommendations to the board. Minutes of each committee meeting are included in the board packs distributed prior to board meetings to provide context to deliberations at committee meetings. To ensure board members are able to fully consider what they need to within these committees, and on the board, each director has unrestricted access to the advice and services of senior management, allowing them insight into the business, as well as full access to company and subsidiary information, records, documents and property. Our non-executive directors are encouraged to visit our operations and attend management meetings to get a sense of how they are run. However, they remain independent, allowing management and Exco to fulfil their duties fully. If they feel it is necessary, our board members can request independent, professional advice at the company’s expense. |
Principle 2.24 | ||
A governance framework should be agreed between the group and its subsidiary boards | ✔ | The board reviewed the board delegation of authority and approved a revised delegation of authority framework on 25 August 2014. The framework was adopted by the company’s subsidiaries during September 2014. |
Principle 2.25 | ||
Companies should remunerate their directors and executives fairly and responsibly | ✔ | For more information on Harmony’s remuneration policy, refer to the remuneration report. |
Principle 2.26 | ||
Companies should disclose the remuneration of each director and certain senior executives | ✔ | Refer to the remuneration report. |
Principle 2.27 | ||
Shareholders should approve the company’s remuneration policy | ✔ | The company’s remuneration policy is presented to shareholders for approval at each annual general meeting. Refer to the 2014 notice of the annual general meeting. |
Principle 3.1 | ||
The board should ensure the company has an effective and independent audit committee | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.6 |
Principle 3.2 | ||
Audit committee members should be suitably skilled and experienced independent non-executive directors | ✔ | All five members of the audit and risk committee are independent non-executive directors. The board is satisfied that members of this committee collectively have the appropriate knowledge and experience to fulfil their mandate. |
Principle 3.3 | ||
The audit committee should be chaired by an independent non-executive director | ✔ | The chairman of this committee is an independent non-executive director. |
Principle 3.4 | ||
The audit committee should oversee integrated reporting | ✔ | Harmony prepares an integrated report that is reviewed by the audit and risk committee and recommended to the board for approval. The committee also reviews quarterly results and annual financial statements (including the annual Form 20-F), as well as any other price-sensitive financial information, trading statements, circulars and accompanying information. The committee reviews and confirms the going-concern assumptions and conclusion. For more information, refer to the report of the audit and risk committee. Also refer to principle 2.12 and principle 9.2. |
Principle 3.5 | ||
The audit committee should ensure that a combined assurance model is applied to provide a coordinated approach to all assurance activities | ✔ | A formalised combined assurance framework was implemented on 1 July 2014. |
Principle 3.6 | ||
The audit committee should satisfy itself of the expertise, resources and experience of the company’s finance function Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listings Requirement, section 3.84(g)&(h) |
✔ | The audit and risk committee annually considers the appropriateness of the expertise and adequacy of resources of the finance function, and the expertise and experience of the financial director. Refer to the report of the audit and risk committee. |
Principle 3.7 | ||
The audit committee should be responsible for overseeing the internal audit function | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.10 |
Principle 3.8 | ||
The audit committee should be an integral component of the risk management process | ✔ | Management is responsible for implementing effective risk management processes. This is overseen by the audit and risk committee on behalf of the board. A comprehensive report on risk management appears under Identifying and managing risk. |
Principle 3.9 | ||
The audit committee is responsible for recommending the appointment of the external auditor and overseeing the external audit process | ✔ | The audit and risk committee considered the appointment of the external auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc., as the registered independent auditor for the ensuing year. The committee noted that the current designated partner, Faan Lombard, will oversee the harmony external audit process for another year. The audit and risk committee oversees the external audit process. For more information refer to the audit and risk committee report. |
Principle 3.10 | ||
The audit committee should report to the oard and shareholders on how it has discharged its duties | ✔ | The audit and risk committee reports to the board each quarter on how it has discharged its statutory duties, as well as those assigned by the board. The committee also discloses how it discharged its functions in the review period in the report of the audit and risk committee. |
Principle 4.1 | ||
The board should be responsible for the governance of risk | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.7 |
Principle 4.2 | ||
The board should determine the levels of risk tolerance | ✔ | Risk appetite and tolerance levels are in the process of being defined. |
Principle 4.3 | ||
The risk committee or audit committee should assist the board in carrying out its risk responsibilities | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.7 |
Principle 4.4 | ||
The board should delegate to management the responsibility to design, implement and monitor the risk management plan | ✔ | The risk management policy and plan is implemented by management through coordinated risk management processes. Oversight of these processes lies with the audit and risk committee. |
Principle 4.5 | ||
The board should ensure risk assessments are performed on a continual basis | ✔ | Risk identification, assessment, response and monitoring are performed on a weekly basis at operational level while Exco reviews the corporate/strategic risk profile each quarter. Management provides formal risk reports to the audit and risk committee each quarter. |
Principle 4.6 | ||
The board should ensure frameworks and methodologies are implemented to increase the probability of anticipating unpredictable risks | ✔ | As the enterprise risk management process matures, the subject of unpredictable risks will be specifically addressed. Also refer to principle 4.5. |
Principle 4.7 | ||
The board should ensure that management considers and implements appropriate risk responses | ✔ | Refer to principle 4.5 |
Principle 4.8 | ||
The board should ensure continual risk monitoring by management | ✔ | Refer to principle 4.5 |
Principle 4.9 | ||
The board should receive assurance regarding the effectiveness of the risk management process | ✔ | Management provides formal risk reports to the audit and risk committee each quarter. In addition, the evaluation of the risk management process forms part of the internal audit coverage plan. |
Principle 5.1 | ||
The board should be responsible for information technology (IT) governance | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.8 |
Principle 5.2 | ||
Information technology should be aligned with the performance and sustainability objectives of the company | ✔ | The board recognises that information technology is integral to doing business today, and fundamental in supporting the sustainability and growth of our company. Accordingly, the focus of our information technology division is ensuring accurate, reliable and timely information that supports effective reporting and appropriate management of our business to enable Harmony to achieve its sustainability objectives. |
Principle 5.3 | ||
The board should delegate to management the responsibility for implementation of an information technology governance framework | ✔ | Management is responsible for implementing the information technology governance framework. |
Principle 5.4 | ||
The board should monitor and evaluate significant information technology investments and expenditure | ✔ | The audit and risk committee monitors the return on investment from significant information technology projects. Information technology management ensures the key elements of appropriate project management principles are applied to all information technology projects. |
Principle 5.5 | ||
Information technology should form an integral part of the company’s risk management | ✔ | An information technology steering committee has oversight of various information technology aspects, including governance, compliance and business continuity. |
Principle 5.6 | ||
The board should ensure information assets are managed effectively | ✔ | Formal processes are in place to protect and manage information, including sensitive information processed by the company. |
Principle 5.7 | ||
A risk committee and audit committee should assist the board in carrying out its information technology responsibilities | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.8 |
Principle 6.1 | ||
The board should ensure the company complies with applicable laws and considers adherence to non-binding rules, codes and standards | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.9 |
Principle 6.2 | ||
The board and each director should have a working understanding of the effect of applicable laws, rules, codes and standards on the company and its business | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.20 |
Principle 6.3 | ||
Compliance risk should form an integral part of the company’s risk management process | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.7 |
Principle 6.4 | ||
The board should delegate to management the implementation of an effective compliance framework and processes | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.9 |
Principle 7.1 | ||
The board should ensure there is an effective risk-based internal audit | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.10 |
Principle 7.2 | ||
Internal audit should have a risk-based approach to its plan | ✔ | A fully risk-based audit coverage plan has been developed and approved by the audit and risk committee. This is in line with activities surrounding the roll out of the enterprise risk management strategy, coupled with the combined assurance strategy. |
Principle 7.3 | ||
Internal audit should provide a written assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s system of internal control and risk management | ✔ | Internal audit provides an annual written assessment to the audit and risk committee. This assessment is in accordance with the annual coverage plan. |
Principle 7.4 | ||
The audit committee should be responsible for overseeing internal audit | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.10 |
Principle 7.5 | ||
Internal audit should be strategically positioned to achieve its objectives | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.10 |
Principle 8.1 | ||
The board should appreciate that stakeholders’ perceptions affect a company’s reputation | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.11 |
Principle 8.2 | ||
The board should delegate to management to proactively deal with stakeholder relationships | ✔ | Regular engagement with key stakeholders provides valuable information on their expectations. While stakeholder engagement takes place across the company, a senior executive is responsible for key stakeholder relationships. The social and ethics committee monitors projects and initiatives in place with various stakeholders. |
Principle 8.3 | ||
The board should strive to achieve the appropriate balance between its various stakeholder groupings, in the best interests of the company | ✔ | A formal stakeholder engagement policy was approved by the social and ethics committee on behalf of the board in August 2013 and will be reviewed every Securities and Exchange Commissionond year. |
Principle 8.4 | ||
Companies should ensure the equitable treatment of shareholders | ✔ | All shareholders, including minority shareholders, are treated equally. The company abides by the requirements of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange and New York Stock Exchange ensuring that full, equal and timeous public disclosure is made to all shareholders and the general public on the activities of Harmony that are price sensitive. |
Principle 8.5 | ||
Transparent and effective communication with stakeholders is essential for building and maintaining their trust and confidence | ✔ | In terms of our stakeholder engagement policy and in line with our corporate values of honesty and connectedness, the board provides information to stakeholders that is complete, timely, relevant, accurate and easily accessible. |
Principle 8.6 | ||
The board should ensure disputes are resolved as efficiently and expeditiously as possible | ✔ | The audit and risk committee monitors all material legal disputes and reports to the board quarterly. Proper dispute resolution practices are in place. |
Principle 9.1 | ||
The board should ensure the integrity of the company’s integrated report | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.12 |
Principle 9.2 | ||
Sustainability reporting and disclosure should be integrated with the company’s financial reporting | ✔ | Refer to principle 2.12 and principle 3.4. Harmony is committed to maintaining a positive relationship with all its stakeholders and communicates regularly with shareholders and other stakeholders on its financial and operational performances, and strategy. The integrated report contextualises the financial results by reporting on the positive and negative impacts of Harmony’s operations on stakeholders as well as plans to improve positives and eradicate or mitigate negatives in the year ahead. |
Principle 9.3 | ||
Sustainability reporting and disclosure should be independently assured | ✔ | Each year, selected key performance indicators – those most material to stakeholders’ understanding of our performance – are independently assured. In recent years, we have steadily aimed to increase the number of indicators assured, as well as the depth of this assurance. The social and ethics committee, under its terms of reference, approves the material elements of sustainability reporting over which the external assurance provider should provide assurance and ensures that a formal process of assurance on sustainability reporting is established through the audit and risk committee. |