SA rand
Figures in million				2010	2009
17	Trade and other receivables
	Current
	Financial assets:
	Trade receivables (gold)			333	245
	Other trade receivables (a)			36	42
	Provision for impairment			(19)	(17)
	Trade receivables – net			350	270
	Interest and other receivables (b)			16	15
	Employee receivables			15	20
	Insurance claims receivable (c)			54	3
	Non-financial assets:
	Prepayments			8	15
	Total current trade and other receivables			443	323
	Non-current
	Financial assets:
	Loans receivables (d)			149	186
	Provision for impairment (e)			(116)	(125)
	Loans receivables – net			33	61
	Loan to Harmony Share Trust			3	3
	Total non-current trade and other receivables			36	64
	(a)	Included in other trade receivables is an amount of R6  million (2009: R68  million) owed by Rand Uranium, a related party (refer to note 29).
	(b)	Included in interest and other receivables is an amount of R7  million owing by Pamodzi FS in terms of the asset purchase agreements, for rehabilitation trust funds to be released to the company.
	(c)	The insurance claim receivable of R54  million relates to damage caused by an underground fire at the Bambanani operation. The claim was settled subsequent to 30 June 2010.
	(d)	Loans comprise various loans, which have been valued by the directors. Included in this balance is the loan of R116  million (2009: R116  million) owed by Pamodzi. The loan bore interest at prime rate until March 2009 when Pamodzi was placed into liquidation. Also included in this balance in 2009 was a loan of R9  million due from Ubuntu Small Scale Mining (Pty) Ltd (Ubuntu). The loan bore interest at prime less 3% with no fixed repayment terms.
	(e)	Included in this balance is the amount of R116  million (2009: R116  million) relating to the loan owed by Pamodzi. Also included in the balance in the 2009 financial year is an amount of R9  million relating to the loan owed by Ubuntu, which was subsequently written-off in the 2010 financial year.
	The movement in the provision for impairment of trade receivables during the year was as follows:
	Balance at beginning of year			17	10
	Impairment loss recognised			5	8
	Receivables written-off during the year			–	(1)
	Unused amounts reversed			(3)	–
	Balance at end of year			19	17
	The movement in the provision for impairment of loans receivable during the year was as follows:
	Balance at beginning of year			125	14
	Impairment loss recognised			–	117
	Loans written off during the year			(9)	(6)
	Balance at end of year			116	125
	The ageing of trade receivables at the reporting date was:
				2010
				Gross	Impairment
	30 June 2010
	Fully performing			325	–
	Past due by 1 to 30 days			11	–
	Past due by 31 to 60 days			12	–
	Past due by 61 to 90 days			–	–
	Past due by more than 90 days			9	8
	Past due by more than 361 days			12	11
	Balance at 30 June 2009			369	19
				SA rand
	Figures in  million			2010	2009
				2009
				Gross	Impairment
	30 June 2009
	Fully performing			250	–
	Past due by 1 to 30 days			17	–
	Past due by 31 to 60 days			1	–
	Past due by 61 to 90 days			–	–
	Past due by more than 90 days			9	7
	Past due by more than 361 days			10	10
	Balance at 30 June 2009			287	17
				2010
				Gross	Impairment
	The ageing of loans receivable at the reporting date was:
	30 June 2010
	Fully performing			33	–
	Past due by 1 to 30 days			–	–
	Past due by 31 to 60 days			–	–
	Past due by 61 to 90 days			–	–
	Past due by more than 90 days			–	–
	Past due by more than 361 days			116	116
	Balance at 30 June 2009			149	116
				2009
				Gross	Impairment
	30 June 2009
	Fully performing			61	–
	Past due by 1 to 30 days			–	–
	Past due by 31 to 60 days			–	–
	Past due by 61 to 90 days			–	–
	Past due by more than 90 days			4	4
	Past due by more than 361 days			121	121
	Balance at 30 June 2008			186	125
	Based on past experience, the company believes that no impairment allowance is necessary in respect of fully performing receivables as the amount relates to customers that have a good track record with the company. Similarly, the loans and receivables noted above, other than those that have been provided for, are fully performing and considered to be a low risk
	The company does not hold any collateral in respect of financial assets.
	During the 2010 and 2009 financial years there was no renegotiation of the terms of any receivable.